I know that the conventional wisdom is that its a bad thing because it makes it harder for 3rd party candidates to matter, but I’m not sure that’s true.
In a battleground state, a third party candidate can have a magnified effect.
In a “safe” state, voters can feel free to vote for a 3rd party candidate without wasting their vote. That seems like it would be an effective recruiting tool for someone like Nader, because if you live in California say, its ok, to vote for Nader because Kerry will probably take that state anyways.
Comments (1)
You are invited to check out some relevant pages in the field of betting …
Posted by tournament | October 8, 2005 8:05 AM
Posted on October 8, 2005 08:05