Email The Bastard
About The Bastard

Fun, But Not Safe For Work
Today's Hot Babe (changes daily)
Preview Babe of the Day
Weekly Video
Even More Nekkidness
Why I have Nekkid Women on my Blog

« I'm Back! | Main | Iraq Since April »

Broom Jumping

My editor at [The Noise](http://www.thenoise.us) seems to be unable to receive email consistently, so this month's rant didn't make it in. Sigh. Well, here it is for you internet readers at any rate. ###Jumping Over Brooms Yet another group of people is attempting to screw up marriage. Now that there are idiots on both sides, I can vent with impunity, and you’ll know I’m an equal opportunity bastard. This makes me very happy. We’ve forgotten what marriage really means. Let’s go back, back to the good old days when everyone lived in caves. When Zoog got caught sneaking into Moog’s cave, the members of the local tribe would get together and make a broom. At the nightly bonfire, Zoog and Moog would jump over the broom. This meant that Zoog no longer had to sneak into Moog’s cave because now everyone knew that Zoog and Moog were a couple. Moog and Zoog got to keep the broom. (Really, I’m not making this up, this is how Irish people used to get hitched.) Things really haven’t changed very much. Sure, now we give vacuum cleaners and fondue sets instead of brooms, but same-old same-old really. Yet in the big picture this whole jumping-over-brooms thing is completely messed up. That’s because Moog and Zoog ruined it for everyone when they invited tribal chief Kahuna, to watch them jump over the broom. Kahuna saw how much fun everyone was having and immediately thought “There’s got to be a way I can make some more seashells on this”. You can always count on the government to mess up a good thing. Now after you jump over a broom, you have to register the fact that you jumped over a broom with the government, and _this costs you money_. If you want to throw the broom on a bonfire, you have to register _that_ with the government, and this _costs you even more money_ and you have to talk to _lawyers_. Because you’ve jumped over a broom, the government _charges you more in taxes_, and you can’t complain because if your spouse hears you, they’ll think you don’t believe they’re worth the extra money every year. The government’s not the only group to screw up broom jumping. People only do as much work as they have to, and so while they could have said “the person who we’ll stick with your debts when you die, so they might as well be on your health insurance”, they called that “your spouse”. So this simple act of jumping over a broom now has all sorts of extra legal baggage attached to it. No one even knows how much baggage is attached to it, because like I said, people are sloppy, so they used “married” in a lot of situations where it might not be appropriate. No one, not even the Supreme Court. Meanwhile, gay people, who have been jumping over brooms for years have been feeling left out. They want in. I’m sorry, but anyone who says “I’d like to pay more in taxes, please” must be a complete idiot. I’ve thought that about the Democratic presidential candidates for years; now I’ll have to lump gay people into that category as well. Never give the government more money then you have to. I know, I know. You think somehow, if you have the government register all this broom jumping, that instead of having to fill out 20 different forms, you’ll only have to file 1 with the government. I don’t know where you got this delusion that the government is there to make your life easier, but its just wrong. If you all had just asked me, I would have told you. It doesn’t help. Instead of filling out 20 different forms that say “I’d like this person to make this sort of decision for me” you have to fill out 20 different forms that say “I’m married to this person, so they can make this decision for me”. At the end of the day, its the same thing. You’d actually be better off going to a lawyer and having him craft a piece of paper that says “Moog good. Me like Moog. Signed, Zoog” than you are getting the government involved. Because if you get the government involved, somehow its going to end up costing you a lot more money. The mistake gay people are making is thinking that broom jumping and marriage are the same thing. They’re not. Being married is the government tax on broom jumping. The government pretends to give “married” people privileges, but if you talk to any lawyer, you’ll find out that’s a lie. So gay marriage would be a disaster for gays, and it would be a disaster for the rest of us as well, because we have all these sloppy definitions in our society where we used “married” and we should have used something else. Bottom line, more taxes on gays, more lawyers, more paperwork for everyone. So I’m against it, because while I could care less about _other peoples_ sex lives, anything that means I have to do more paperwork is bad. Plus somehow whenever someone says that other people are going to have to pay more taxes, it really means that _I_ have to pay more taxes. Perhaps gay people feel that if gay broom jumping was officially recognized by the government that they’d get more love and respect from the rest of us. Guys, this is a capitalist society. If you want more love and respect from the rest of us, its very simple. Give us money. Otherwise, we’ll treat you like everyone else. As you’ve noticed, that’s not so great, but if you think the government would be any better, go wait in line at the Motor Vehicle Department. Which brings us to the next group of idiots. The Proposition 107 people. These people are so worried that the government might recognize gay broom jumping that they want to amend the state constitution. A moment’s reflection on the capability of lawyers to argue should have convinced them this was a bad idea; I suspect that if we called it the “Protect Broom Jumping Amendment” everyone would realize exactly how stupid this is. Would me and my wife need a note from our doctor saying that her “fun bits” were different than my “fun bits” before we could register our broom jumping with the state? Bottom line: More paperwork, more lawyers, and we don’t even get to stick gay people with a higher tax bill. These people have to be _even stupider_ than the gay marriage people. So both of you: Leave broom jumping alone, or I’ll come over there and smack you silly.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.opinionatedbastard.com/mt-tb.cgi/667

Comments (5)

ernie:

I agree, gay marriage should not be a political issue. But it is becasue it is a winner for the GOP fundamentalist base to show up at the polls to declare Gods law and vote for right wing corrupt poltiticians. Jeff Gannon America, the righteous, the moral…ya right.

But for gays, rights is a serious matter. i dont think gays care about state sanctioned broom jumping, they care about being able to see their partner on his deathbed, being able to transfer assets upon death, being able not to have their children ripped from them by authorities, about being able to get health care from their spouse, etc…its about rights. This is a free country built on equality, right?

Ps. have ya changed your views on Iraq yet, your previous predictions are quite far off the mark. Mine are right on the money….ahhh hate to say it but “I told ya so”.

ernie

Opinionated Bastard [TypeKey Profile Page]:

That is the party line, that it’s all about being able to see their loved ones on their deathbed.

It’s a good argument.

It’s also totally bogus. There’s no law that says “your spouse can see you on your deathbed”.

It’s “hospital policy”, which means the nurses just make it up as they go along. So changing the law won’t change anything.

Same with most of the other arguments. Having a legally recognized broom jump only makes some legal difference. Anna Nicole Smith married that 98 year old guy. That didn’t mean she got all his money when he died.

So while I agree to some extent about gay marriage as a concept, I see it as the gays are going to kick over the beehive. Now the religious conservatives are also going to kick over the beehive.

Don’t kick over the beehive!

As for Iraq, I don’t think you’ve ever quite understood my position on Iraq. I never said Iraq was going to be all daisies and chocolate bunnies. In fact, I’ve often said that the best we could hope for was a slightly improved version of a typical middle eastern state.

But I haven’t reviewed the latest data yet. I suspect I may find much to depress me about our current state.

But I find your gloating at a US foreign policy failure asinine. You may not have liked that Bush rolled the dice in Iraq, but gloating that he rolled Snake Eyes when no one else was willing to do anything about the Middle East shows a lack of understanding about the world and life.

There are no sure things, Ernie. I’ll always support someone who takes a chance over someone who sits on his ass and criticizes others.

ernie:

There’s no law that says “your spouse can see you on your deathbed”.

-This is ignorant, sorry. Hypothetical: Man gets sick, man has “husband”. Sick man’s family hates gays, sick mans spouse can be left outside at family request. FACT. argument over.

“I’ve often said that the best we could hope for was a slightly improved version of a typical middle eastern state. “

Great idea! Worth 2700 US lives and, well who knows 100,000-200,000 IRaqis? 300 billion USDs, or maybe a trillion goven the welfare needed for all those emotionally wrecked and missing limbs? Its a good thing you forgot about WMDs and Al Queada connections.

“But I haven’t reviewed the latest data yet. I suspect I may find much to depress me about our current state.”

I hope here you are speaking of the US economy and the coming real estate/debt collapse ala 1997 Asia.

“find your gloating at a US foreign policy failure asinine. You may not have liked that Bush rolled the dice in Iraq, but gloating that he rolled Snake Eyes when no one else was willing to do anything about the Middle East shows a lack of understanding about the world and life.”

Im not gloating about a “failure of US foreign policy”….Im GLOATING about your ideological rigidity and of those who you support.

YOU FOLKS ARE A PROGRESSIVE’S DREAM. keep it up.

Good day,

Ernie

Opinionated Bastard [TypeKey Profile Page]:

“Man gets sick, man has “husband”. Sick man’s family hates gays, sick mans spouse can be left outside at family request. FACT. argument over.”

Not FACT. Has nothing to do with the law here. I’m talking about changing the LAW here, you’re talking about HOSPITAL POLICY. So you’re already assuming that:

  1. The sick man is incommunicado. Hospitals let patients determine who can/cannot see patients unless the police are involved.

  2. A simple piece of paper from the sick man signed is enough for the hospital. All the patient has to say is “this person is my next of kin”, and that’s enough for the hospital.

Making gay marriage “legal” won’t necessarily affect hospital policy. That’s my point.

You want to disprove this? Call FMC and ask them what their policies are.

mns:

Dude, why do you want to take “progressives’” dreams from them? Don’t you know that’s all they have left?

Post a comment


Technorati

Technorati search

» Blogs that link here

Archives